Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Opinionated Ranter - The Adventures of Being Awesome...

 
I am but a man trying to live the dream. This is how I see the world...

Opinionated Ranter - January 2007

ISLAM 5 (cont'd)

Mr. Brian Summers of Richmond, B.C. makes an interesting point in his letter to the editor.
"The truth is that the Palestinians don't really want or need a state. They don't care if they live under Jordanian, Syrian or self rule; they just want the Jews gone." That comment from correspondent Jimmy Hagarty perfectly summaries the conflict between Jew and Arab in the Middle East. Whether in the 60 years since Israel was founded, or the years before then when Jews were a minority, nothing has changed. What are now known as the West Bank and Gaza -- from between 1948 and 1967 -- were once under Jordanian and Egyptian rule, respectively. There was no Palestinian uprising against the "occupation," nor were there demands for a Palestinian state. Mr. Hagarty's statement should be prominently displayed in all council rooms of the UN and its agencies, as well as CIDA and other government agencies that provide "aid" to the Palestinians. And to ensure it is learned, all members of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation should be required to write it out 100 times," he writes. The last sentence is in reference to Sid Ryan's order to his union (CUPE) to boycott any goods from Israel.

It seems Mr. Summers has seen what a lot of us have missed. I wish I had thought of it this way.
Comments (4)Comments (4) Add CommentsAdd Comments
58
Vote
   


ISLAM 4 (cont'd)

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad recently made news by hosting an international conference devoted to Holocaust denial. While we here in the West objected to this latest expression of radicalism and hatred, Mr. Ahmadinejad doesn't care what we think. By making noise against the United States, Israel and Western civilization in general, the President has wagered, he can make Iranians forget the unemployment, corruption, stagnation and theocratic repression besetting their nation. However, there is evidence that Iranians aren't as easily duped as Mr. Ahmadinejad thinks. Local elections show candidates aligned with Mr. Ahmadinejad did not fare well in many races. In a number of key cities, the President's hardline allies were unable to win even a single seat. This means little in the way the country is governed though. The "Supreme Leader," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ultimately dictates the nation's policies. And he and his mullahs know they cannot ignore the will of the people entirely. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his ruling clique of Shiite clerics have remained in power by maintaining a delicate balance. That is, enforcing the forms of an Islamist state in the public sphere, but permitting citizens to drink alcohol, watch satellite television, blog and otherwise behave like infidels in their private lives.

Mr. Ahmadinejad is destroying that balance, shutting down reformist newspapers and persecuting Iranians deemed insufficiently pious. He is also pursuing a reckless foreign policy, calling for Israel's destruction as he simultaneously insists that his country's nuclear program has only peaceful uses. Many Iranians no doubt share their President's hatred of Israel. But a majority likely question whether prosecuting this hatred is worth turning their nation into an international pariah.
But there is a glimmer of hope. Chinks in the political armour of Mr. Ahmadinejad have begun to multiply. While Mr. Ahmadinejad has dismissed recently imposed U.N. sanctions as "a scrap of paper," a recent editorial in Jomhuri-yi Islami, a newspaper reflecting the views of the country's political and religious elite, stated that "The resolution is certainly harmful for the country. [It is] too much to call it a piece of torn paper." Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, a senior Iranian cleric, declared that Mr. Ahmadinejad's confrontational nuclear policy is harming Iranian interests. The President also has problems with ordinary Iranians, whom he'd promised to help with populist economic policies. Inflation has skyrocketed, unemployment is high, the stock market is down, and the economy is beset by corruption. Many Iranians, including the Grand Ayatollah wonder aloud why a country with such wealth in oil and gas can't seem to take care of basic necessities. Mr. Ahmadinejad is a holocaust denier who openly speaks about the destruction of Israel and the End of Days. His fall from grace within Iran may help peacefully remove this madman from power.
While the sanctions purported to ban the transfers of sensitive nuclear materials to Iran, there were plenty of loopholes inserted at the insistence of China and Russia, Iran's traditional defenders at the UN Security Council. When the UN Security Council imposed these sanctions against Tehran on December 23, many commentators dismissed the move as a slap on the wrist. Just think what might happen if the sanctions actually had some teeth. If Russia and China come to their senses, and permit the UN Security Council to get truly serious with Iran, Mr. Ahmadinejad could well become yesterday's man, and the world will become a safer place.
Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
55
Vote
   


ONE FOR QUEBEC II

Why does the name Herouxville, Que. Mean absolutely nothing to you? Because it is not quite famous yet. Why should it become famous, you ask? Because they are showing some backbone.
The people of Herouxville, Que., say they welcome immigrants to their small town, but there are a few things they want to make clear. A code of standards sent to the federal and provincial governments last week by Herouxville's municipal council has put the town of 1,300 inhabitants at the centre of Quebec's increasingly divisive debate over integrating minorities. It is a shame not more of us are following their example. The code of standards basically tells immigrants to check their old ways at the door.
In years past, this has not posed a problem. European immigrants came to this country, and while they held on to their heritage, they assimilated with Canadians and joined them to make a strong, proud country. They knew that in their own little world they could still eat familiar foods, speak their native language and worship in their own religion. But when push came to shove, and things needed to be done, either to survive or build for the greater good, all those things fell by the wayside and everyone worked together as one to accomplish a task. When the whistle blew at the end of the day, they could all go to their own homes and pick up where they left off that morning. It was a good system that everyone respected and it didn't cause any problems. Well, times have changed and apparently the good citizens of Herouxville are not that crazy about the changes.
Some of the items on their code of standards include:
- It is forbidden to stone women, burn them alive, throw acid on them or circumcise girls. - Consumption of alcohol is common in Herouxville, as is dancing. "At the end of every year, we decorate a tree with balls and tinsel and some lights. This is normally called 'Christmas decorations' or also 'Christmas tree.' " - Boys and girls swim together in public pools. - Veils are not welcome. "The only time you may mask or cover your face is during Halloween."
Pretty straight forward. If you are offended by these rules, move elsewhere. Graeme Hamilton writes, "Andre Drouin, a town councillor, said the town's Web site had received more than 2,000 e-mails since its initiative became known on Saturday. "I would say 99% are positive," he said. A man named Serge from Terrebonne was just one example: "At last, someone is standing up instead of prostrating themselves like certain ministers, judges, executives and companies," he wrote. Quebec media have been full of stories suggesting public officials are going too far to accommodate religious practices. These included a Montreal YMCA that agreed to tint its windows to ensure students at a Hasidic boys' school would not be distracted by exercising women, and guidelines to Montreal police officers suggesting female officers should leave it to their male colleagues to interview Hasidic men. Mr. Hamilton goes on to say, "Mario Dumont, leader of the opposition Action democratique du Quebec, called this month for a Quebec constitution to enshrine the province's Christian-based values, which he said are under attack by the forces of political correctness."
How refreshing it is to read something like that. We have become so PC that anyone but a liberal chokes on it. Mr. Drouin is quoted as saying, "We have to ensure that people who settle here are happy. If someone comes here and says, 'I want a swimming pool where my daughter can swim, but she can't swim with little boys,' we have a real problem. We are not racists. We invite people from all nationalities, all languages, all sexual orientations, whatever, to come live with us, but we want them to know ahead of time how we live."
The unfortunate thing is that most immigrants already know how we live. They just feel they are a bit more equal than the rest of us and demand we accommodate them, lest they play the bigot card. The liberals are more than willing to do this. It's time the pendulum swung back.
Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
68
Vote
   


TRUCKERS

The controversy over trucks continues. There are those out there who insist trucks be made to travel on their own separate roads, away from the main highways. It is easy to see why some people feel this way. They are the ones who don't know how to drive.
I drove a truck for some years, although it wasn't a big rig. It was a five ton straight truck and saw enough to gain a great respect for those who drive the 18, 24 and 36 wheelers. The little guys driving cars think handling one of these rigs is the same as handling their own tiny (in comparison) vehicles.
Big trucks, laden down with several tons of goods, do not stop as quickly as a car does. Thus when some idiot slams his brakes on in front of a big rig and gets his trunk shoved up his backside, it naturally becomes the fault of the truck driver. Some jerks get their jollies by weaving in and out of traffic and not giving the truck enough room when they cut in front of it


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
69
Vote
   


JIMMY CARTER

An editorial in today's paper caught my eye. It should catch the eye of everyone who believes Jimmy Carter is right about Israel and Palestine.
"Since its release more than two months ago, Jimmy Carter's Palestine: Peace not Apartheid has been subject to two basic criticisms: 1 It presents a highly biased rewriting of Arab-Israeli history to support Mr. Carter's view that Israeli aggression is behind all the region's ills, and 2 it carries a tone some regard as anti-Semitic. Of the two critiques, the second is the more serious." It is Jimmy's book and he can rewrite all the history he wants. It won't change any facts. But as the editorial points out, the accusation of anti-Semitism is very serious.
I saw Jimmy on a TV interview the other day, and like all skilled politicians, he had a nice way of putting a spin on every question that was asked of him. The thing he skated over first was that so many of his former aides have quit since the book was published. Why? The editorial says, "In December, Ken Stein, the long-time Middle East fellow at Mr. Carter's centre for peace and development in Atlanta, resigned his post, alleging that he had brought several falsehoods in Palestine: Peace not Apartheid to the author's attention, but that Mr. Carter refused to correct them before the book went to press. Mr. Stein, who co-authored an earlier book by president Carter on the Middle East conflict, accused his former friend and boss of "egregious errors of both commission and omission," and of manipulating information, redefining facts, and exaggerating conclusions "to suit his desired ends." Mr. Stein even insisted Mr. Carter had copied large sections of his book from other sources


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (4)Comments (4) Add CommentsAdd Comments
65
Vote
   


KYOTO II

Lorne Gunter is a respected writer and outspoken critic on Kyoto and global warming. An article of his came to me today and I thought it merited some discussion.
Apparently, on Friday, the United Nations' global warming spin factory will switch into high gear with the release of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) latest report. This report, some several hundred pages long is filled with dry scientific papers that are usually far less definitive about the causes and effects of climate change. The spin the UN wants to put on global warming is contained in the Summary for Policy Makers. But this summary was not written by scientists, rather by politicians and activists. And this can be very dangerous.
It will almost certainly insist that since the last report was issued in 2001, there is a growing consensus showing that there is proof of a man-made disaster coming and the scientific community agrees with this. It will infer the only solution is a massive remaking of industrialized society presided over by international bureaucrats and environmentalists. Scientists who disagree or refuse to swallow this have been dropped by the committees that write and review the IPCC's individual reports. Their doubts, no matter how substantial and well-documented, have been expunged from the final drafts


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
68
Vote
   


UPDATE

A while ago I wrote about a pedophile priest who was finally convicted of molesting some 47 girls in 5 parishes over the period of 30 years. The man was 84 when he was sentenced. I'm pleased to report that Charles Sylvestre died last Monday night, after serving just a few months in prison.
I also wrote about the 55 year old millwright who, while driving drunk, killed a deaf senior and laid the blame on everyone but himself. He was sentenced to three years in prison and will also be prohibited from driving for 10 years once he has served his prison time. Daniel Rouleau's penitentiary term started immediately after Justice Nancy Mossip handed down her sentence. The only thing wrong with all this is that Rouleau had been sentanced to 7 to 10 years and got credit for time spent in jail awaiting trial. I still think that time shouldn't count.
Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
74
Vote
   


SHARIAH LAW

A rather sad story came across my desk this morning and I thought it was worth going into. It seems a Muslim woman and her baby daughter were stabbed by her husband. He pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated assault to avoid attempted murder charges. Smart move on this guys part. He attacked the wife in their Montreal apartment in February 2006, stabbing her several times, including in the face. He then stabbed the infant girl twice in the stomach. She spent 10 days in hospital recovering. I don't think he'd last too long in prison. Even convicts have their own code of ethics. The man also denied he needed treatment for his violent behaviour. Yeah, and Paris Hilton doesn't need to wear panties.
What is sad about this case is that she can get a legal divorce in Quebec. Whether or not it is recognized in Lebanon is another matter. And that is the crux of the matter. The woman earlier told the court she would like to return to her family in Lebanon but without a religious divorce she worries that she could be forced to return to her husband or face charges of abducting her own daughter. Both Quebec and Ontario have passed laws banning the use of any religious tribunals, Muslim, Jewish or otherwise, to settle family law disputes like custody and divorce. Unfortunately, many Muslim women want a Shariah stamp of approval. "They had a religious marriage in Lebanon and if she returns she could have problems," Crown lawyer Sophie Lavergne told the judge.
The husband claims he will not agree to a divorce under Shariah law in Canada. "The issue of the divorce will be decided over there," he told the judge. Critics say it's an example of the inequality of women in Shariah law that a man can simply refuse a religious divorce, even in such a case. So, she can either have a legal divorce under the laws of Canada, or she can insist on returning to Lebanon and facing Islamic law there. I don't know if this woman holds dual citizenship or not, but I wonder at her insistence to return to a war torn country with this hanging over her head. How soon would she become a Canadian of convenience and ask us to rescue her for her tormentors


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (20)Comments (20) Add CommentsAdd Comments
87
Vote
   


ATHEISTS

"It is not up to the atheist to disprove that God exists. What makes one an atheist, or at minimum an agnostic, is the fact that there are no arguments that prove the existence of God. The burden of proof clearly lies with the theist. Furthermore, to suggest that God exists because the atheist cannot prove his inexistence (sic) is a logical fallacy. This fallacy is known as "the argument from ignorance."
Steve Rose, Montreal."
The foregoing was a letter to the editor I ran across the other day. It got me to wondering just what is up with the new movement of atheism


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (30)Comments (30) Add CommentsAdd Comments
106
Vote
   


YOU ARE NOT ALONE

I have read a great deal lately about how our American neighbours are getting screwed by the Democrats. Like our Liberals, the Democrats want to throw enough money at a problem in the hopes that it will just go away. This doesn't work and never has. Our minority Conservative government has done more in one year than the previous Liberal government did in 13.
Just so the Americans don't feel too bad, the following is an article by Linda Leatherdale of the Toronto Sun. I know Ontarians are outraged at the present provincial government and look forward to a return of sanity by electing Conservatives. Of course, this being provincial politics, it pales in comparison to what the Fed's do, but it is a good indication.
Cheer up America. You are not alone in your outrage


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (2)Comments (2) Add CommentsAdd Comments
64
Vote
   


CITGO

I've been wondering why I keep seeing Citgo ads that say they are providing low cost home heating oil to the poor thanks to their friends in Venezuela. I have to assume they are talking about their friend Hugo Chavez. What got me wondering about this is that Mr. Chavez is the one who came to American soil, albeit the grounds of the UN, and proceeded to trash George W. Bush, calling him a devil, amongst other things. The UN may be deemed to be neutral ground, but I still thought Chavez was way out of line with his diatribe.
So why would Chavez want to sell his oil to a country run by a devil? Money mostly. By buying this oil, at least one American company is helping this dictator fill his own pockets. I can't remember hearing about the plight of the ordinary Venezuelan being eased by these petro dollars.
I'm sure that if push ever comes to shove between the USA and Venezuela, the Lib/Dems will point out how the USA supported him and in essence gave him money to buy weapons that might someday be used against the US. An interesting little tidbit showed up on my desk today that may explain a lot


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
71
Vote
   


MESSAGE FROM A FRIEND

I received this in my e-mail this morning from a friend. I have no idea who originally put it together, but I offer it in its entirety for your viewing pleasure.
If only we had this philosophy in both the United States and in Canada, enough is enough
Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks. A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia and her Queen at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his Ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown. Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that Australia was a secular state, and its laws were made by parliament. "If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you", he said on National Television. "I'd be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia : one the Australian law , this is true , and another Islamic law that is false. If you can't agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country, which practices it, perhaps, then, that's a better option", Costello said. Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country. Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should "clear off. Basically people who don't want to be Australians, and who don't want, to live by Australian values and understand them, well then, they can basically clear off", he said. Separately,Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques. Quote: "IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians." "However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the 'politically correct' crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Australia ." "However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here,need to understand." "This idea of Australia being a multi-cultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. And as Australians, we have our own culture, our own society,our own language and our own lifestyle." "This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles,trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom" "We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese , Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society .. Learn the language!" (English)"Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing,political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If our God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture." "We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us." "If the Southern Cross offends you, or you don't like "A Fair Go", then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. By all means, keep your culture, but do not force it on others. "This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'." "If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted." Maybe if we circulate this amongst ourselves, American and Canadian citizens will find the backbone to start speaking and voicing the same truths!
Comments (4)Comments (4) Add CommentsAdd Comments
66
Vote
   


ISLAM (cont'd) III

Recently we had a ruckus here in town involving the Muslim crowd vs the Christians. Zachariah Anani, who claims to be a former Muslim terrorist who has converted to Christianity, gave a lecture at a local Baptist church expounding on the view that Islam is basically a violent religion. I wasn't present so I rely on news reports to bring this article to you.
Mr. Anani claims to have been a terrorist in the mid-East and claims to have killed 223 people. If this is true, how he ever got past our immigration officials is beyond me. He should have been turned back at the border one day one, but that is a whole other story.
Apparently Mr. Anani quoted extensively from the Qur'an during this lecture and this led to the brouhaha. He quoted passages where the Qur'an says it is okay to kill all the infidels and right away the Muslim gang accused him of taking the quotes out of context. How can you put something like that into a good context? "Kill all the infidels..........but do it gently"? Sorry, I don't buy it. If someone tells me to kill someone else, there is only one context to take it in, no matter how much spin you put on it


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (9)Comments (9) Add CommentsAdd Comments
81
Vote
   


ONE FOR QUEBEC

People who have read me in the past know that I am certainly not a flag waving Quebec fan. However, I do have to give credit where credit is due. They are finally on the verge of doing something right.
Tell me if the following sounds ridiculous to you:
- Men banned from pre-natal classes at a Montreal community health centre so as not to offend Muslim, Sikh or Hindu women


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
57
Vote
   


ROAD RAGE

Does this happen where you live, or is it just in my home town?
Recently, we had an intersection torn up, to make it ‘new and improved' I suppose. The reason for doing the work of upgrading was given as safety issues. Fair enough. The intersection certainly has been improved and more traffic friendly than it was before.
It was ripped apart for a few months, but access through the construction zone was never blocked. You might have to wait a minute or two longer to get through, but on the whole, you could coast through it without too much trouble. The results were stunning. A whole new intersection with widened lanes and easier to negotiate turn lanes. Sight lines were improved immensely and the whole thing was paved in concrete that would stand up to heavy traffic flow from semi's


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (5)Comments (5) Add CommentsAdd Comments
60
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
257 Posts dating from January 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by Zach Larkins
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]